<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Play Dress-Up - A Game For All The Cabinet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bbdo.co.uk/blog/archives/415/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bbdo.co.uk/blog/archives/415</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Unsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.bbdo.co.uk/blog/archives/415#comment-13612</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Unsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bbdo.co.uk/blog/archives/415#comment-13612</guid>
		<description>And I suppose some of them would prefer a rather more fetching shade of pink, too, a bit like Goering was reputed to do.  Now which one(s) of them would be a suitable choice, eh?

I suppose the real problem is getting the Quartermaster to provide sufficient uniforms.  After all, if you add up the total number of mendacious lying shits in New Labour you'd probably have enough for a rather larger Army than the one we currently have scattered about the world.

The pity is that the New Labour Army won't be getting shot at.  Now there's a thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I suppose some of them would prefer a rather more fetching shade of pink, too, a bit like Goering was reputed to do.  Now which one(s) of them would be a suitable choice, eh?</p>
<p>I suppose the real problem is getting the Quartermaster to provide sufficient uniforms.  After all, if you add up the total number of mendacious lying shits in New Labour you&#8217;d probably have enough for a rather larger Army than the one we currently have scattered about the world.</p>
<p>The pity is that the New Labour Army won&#8217;t be getting shot at.  Now there&#8217;s a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.bbdo.co.uk/blog/archives/415#comment-13597</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bbdo.co.uk/blog/archives/415#comment-13597</guid>
		<description>Ha!
Cheers Chuck.

I didn't think I'd have room for them all and I knew someone's favourite would be left out.

Prescott was left out because I'd have to resize the uniform - I suppose I could have left out Blears for a similar reason.

I hope I've included a typical cross-section of mendacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!<br />
Cheers Chuck.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d have room for them all and I knew someone&#8217;s favourite would be left out.</p>
<p>Prescott was left out because I&#8217;d have to resize the uniform - I suppose I could have left out Blears for a similar reason.</p>
<p>I hope I&#8217;ve included a typical cross-section of mendacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Unsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.bbdo.co.uk/blog/archives/415#comment-13591</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Unsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bbdo.co.uk/blog/archives/415#comment-13591</guid>
		<description>Excellent!  But why only these few candidates?  Money not good enough?  Conditions not quite right?

Still, they'll be able to sort out a few little earners quite quickly.  After all, haven't they done well, so far!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent!  But why only these few candidates?  Money not good enough?  Conditions not quite right?</p>
<p>Still, they&#8217;ll be able to sort out a few little earners quite quickly.  After all, haven&#8217;t they done well, so far!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
